Template talk:Delete: Difference between revisions
From Bulbagarden Archives
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (→Why?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Frankly, we don't need an area in the template where the reason is explained. The edit summary or even text after the template can provide enough information to suffice. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 22:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | :Frankly, we don't need an area in the template where the reason is explained. The edit summary or even text after the template can provide enough information to suffice. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 22:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::But, if we include an area in the template where we can provide a reason, it would save an admin the time of looking at the summary. --[[user:Baby G|Baby G]] <small>([[user talk:Baby G|talk to me]])</small> <small>([[Special:Contributions/Baby_G|see my edits]])</small> 23:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ::But, if we include an area in the template where we can provide a reason, it would save an admin the time of looking at the summary. --[[user:Baby G|Baby G]] <small>([[user talk:Baby G|talk to me]])</small> <small>([[Special:Contributions/Baby_G|see my edits]])</small> 23:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::The summary is easier to look at, and you have two of the most prominent admins on the archives telling you that it wouldn't be necessary; we know more about what is easier for admins to do than you do, because we would be the admins affected. [[User:Moldy orange|Moldy orange]] 01:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:43, 23 September 2008
Why?
As you can see here, I added a part of the template where you can say the reason why the image is being tagged, but Moldy orange reverted it becuase "reasons are stated in edit summaries".But I personally think that it's more convinient to state the reason on the template instead of wasting time with an edit summary. What do you guys think? --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 21:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Frankly, we don't need an area in the template where the reason is explained. The edit summary or even text after the template can provide enough information to suffice. --Shiningpikablu252 22:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- But, if we include an area in the template where we can provide a reason, it would save an admin the time of looking at the summary. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 23:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- The summary is easier to look at, and you have two of the most prominent admins on the archives telling you that it wouldn't be necessary; we know more about what is easier for admins to do than you do, because we would be the admins affected. Moldy orange 01:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- But, if we include an area in the template where we can provide a reason, it would save an admin the time of looking at the summary. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 23:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
