User talk:ShallowShaddoll: Difference between revisions
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Look at the VERY LAST comment on Force Fire's archives talk page, where he says, and I quote " If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine." And no, I wouldn't purposefully cause trouble, but judging by the fact that you lied about not seeing the comment, since you said you looked at every one, despite it being there, means that you seem to be causing trouble. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | Look at the VERY LAST comment on Force Fire's archives talk page, where he says, and I quote " If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine." And no, I wouldn't purposefully cause trouble, but judging by the fact that you lied about not seeing the comment, since you said you looked at every one, despite it being there, means that you seem to be causing trouble. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I saw that. He said it was OK to change the picture since it has a logo, but it was agreed that we ain't changing it to yours since it's worse. Find a more suitable solution or keep it as it is. Changing it just 'cause it had a logo was not the proposed solution we all agreed on...--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 16:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | :I saw that. He said it was OK to change the picture since it has a logo, but it was agreed that we ain't changing it to yours since it's worse. Find a more suitable solution or keep it as it is. Changing it just 'cause it had a logo was not the proposed solution we all agreed on... I can easily do what Rahl does and smear the logo, but that wouldn't really make a difference...--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 16:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:58, 11 December 2016
Welcome
Welcome to the Bulbagarden Archives, ShallowShaddoll! | |
By creating your account you are now able to upload images to help Bulbapedia and Bulbanews. Before you jump in, take a look at these helpful tips:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time uploading here! |
Please don't edit war
Please don't edit war and actually read the whole conversation before jumping to conclusions. Playerking95 (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Please use the talk page, as you were told to do, before reverting good pics with unnecessary pics that blur out the pokemon's actual body, so it's hard to recognize what -mon is using the move.ShallowShaddoll (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, a couple of things. 1. Cut the attitude. 2. This isn't my talk page, so there's no need to discuss what I've done here and 3. It was a completely necessary edit, as it was a picture that was shown making contact, that also shows the Pokemon which is using the move, as I've said before, so please listen this time. Playerking95 (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- 1. Ditto, 2. Don't harass me and order me what to do, so that you'd be pleased. 3. You were told that it does not matter whether moves make contact or not, so that argument does not validate a worse picture. Simple as that. ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not having any attitude with you. 2. I'm not harassing you, I'm just telling you what you shouldn't be doing, because, well, you shouldn't be doing. This is your talk page, not mine. 3. As I have said, physical moves are better when they are shown making contact, so I don't know how many other times I can say that and it's not a worse picture, it's a better one. Playerking95 (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oh rlly now? 2. Yes you are, you are telling me not to do something despite you having no right to do that nor me having any need to agree with you. That is harassment. 3. Not true, you were told that contact does not influence a picture's worth - a better quality picture with a visible user is better in this case. Simple as that. You will not prove me wrong because you simply cannot because you are not right. If you are not happy, just go with a moderator so he/she could decide on the picture...--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not having any attitude with you. 2. I'm not harassing you, I'm just telling you what you shouldn't be doing, because, well, you shouldn't be doing. This is your talk page, not mine. 3. As I have said, physical moves are better when they are shown making contact, so I don't know how many other times I can say that and it's not a worse picture, it's a better one. Playerking95 (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- 1. Ditto, 2. Don't harass me and order me what to do, so that you'd be pleased. 3. You were told that it does not matter whether moves make contact or not, so that argument does not validate a worse picture. Simple as that. ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, a couple of things. 1. Cut the attitude. 2. This isn't my talk page, so there's no need to discuss what I've done here and 3. It was a completely necessary edit, as it was a picture that was shown making contact, that also shows the Pokemon which is using the move, as I've said before, so please listen this time. Playerking95 (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, really. Please read what I say. 2. I am not. People he re are allowed to tell you not to do something if it's valid. So, no, no harassment here. 3. Except that I don't really need to convince you, since I know that you are the one who is wrong. - unsigned comment from Playerking95 (talk • contribs)
It is there
Look at the VERY LAST comment on Force Fire's archives talk page, where he says, and I quote " If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine." And no, I wouldn't purposefully cause trouble, but judging by the fact that you lied about not seeing the comment, since you said you looked at every one, despite it being there, means that you seem to be causing trouble. Playerking95 (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I saw that. He said it was OK to change the picture since it has a logo, but it was agreed that we ain't changing it to yours since it's worse. Find a more suitable solution or keep it as it is. Changing it just 'cause it had a logo was not the proposed solution we all agreed on... I can easily do what Rahl does and smear the logo, but that wouldn't really make a difference...--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)