Got a spare minute? The Archives need some love. See the to-do list to find a way to help.
If you upload a new image make sure you name and categorize it properly. If in doubt, ask an admin or see our FAQ page.

User talk:Playerking95

From Bulbagarden Archives
Jump to navigationJump to search


Welcome to the Bulbagarden Archives, Playerking95!
Bulbagarden Archives bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to upload images to help Bulbapedia and Bulbanews. Before you jump in, take a look at these helpful tips:

  • Uploaded images must meet several requirements. Please see the upload form and/or manual of style before you upload a new image.
  • All images need categories and license tags. Save time and fill them out as you upload. There are many different licenses - be sure to pick the best fit.
  • Use meaningful filenames. Make them descriptive so that searchers can find your images easily.
  • Personal images are no longer allowed. Any personal images found will be deleted on sight.
  • If you don't have any images to submit, you can still help out.
  • If you have any more questions, see the FAQ or ask a staff member.
Thank you, and have a good time uploading here!
  Pattyman (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)  


Please add in the summary when uploading images. It describes what the image is. Pattyman (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


Please read the checklist when you upload media files, and be sure to tag and categorize all images. If you're confused about the requirements for uploading files, have a look at this guide. --Pattyman (talk) 18:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

This is your second reminder to be sure to categorize all images. Best~ ht14 16:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Changin' pics

Hi. What's the reason for changing a good, focused and centered pic with the one that shows 95% of the background and only 5% of the Pokemon? This just boggles my mind...--Omojuzeforever (talk) 09:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Because the other one shows Spirtzee whole body and the image isn't so zoomed in on Spritzee. Playerking95 (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I can see that you're just a troll. Thank you. Because of you, I won't be contributing to the archives any more.--Omojuzeforever (talk) 12:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Well, I'm not. And also, do or don't contribute to the archives, that's up to you, but don't stop doing it just because you don't understand what I'm doing.Playerking95 (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


How come you keep uploading over pictures? They're exactly the same without any differences.--Handmaiden 101 (talk) 22:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

There are differences, you just need to look for them and one of the main reasons why I change them are because of the watermarks near the top right of the image. It's better if they weren't there.Playerking95 (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hehe, never mind, I already got it cleared up!Handmaiden 101 (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


Your anime image uploading skills are admirable. Could you upload a new version of File:Oak Rotom Leaf Storm.png, since I feel like a move image where the move isn't even fully executed yet feels kinda wrong. Hope I'm not asking too much. Thank you. --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Image size limit

It's 1280x1280, but if you upload a 1920x1080 (1080p) image, just choose 1280x720 from other resolutions and save the image and reupload it, it'll still look just as good. - PokémonGamer 14:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Ash and Greninja image

I replaced it with the same image just to make that comment. Pay attention to the file size, it's still the same as your image. - PokémonGamer 01:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent Uploads & Reverts

Your upload summary when you reverted Clemont Luxray X-ray vision.png was quite unwarranted. 16:9-era anime screenshots should be uploaded at 1280x720 resolution. Additionally, the version from PokémonGamer is significantly less blurry than the version you originally uploaded. It seems that you and PokémonGamer have some sort of problem, but the Archives is certainly not the place for it. - Kogoro - Talk to me - 09:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Pyroar image

I'll change the Poké TV one then. I didn't see the time it was uploaded. - PokémonGamer 03:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

As for the Jessie Gourgeist image, I'm sorry. It was very easy to confuse. - PokémonGamer 07:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Talonflame picture

What episode was that picture you uploaded from? Because I might be able to get a more non-awkward picture that shows more of Talonflame's body. I don't remember seeing that frame when watching A Legendary Photo Op!, so I know it's not that episode. - PokémonGamer 13:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

The way it's flying is probably how it looks awkward. - PokémonGamer 13:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Me "nitpicking"

It's not "nitpicking" to sharpen an image so it looks more clear, the one you uploaded was too dark as well. My source is, which is where I got that better sharpened version. And stop reverting to your images and edit warring over it just so you can have your name listed next to them, you do not own any of the images here as this is a community project. This is not the place to fight over this like Kogoro has said above. We might literally end up getting both blocked because you brought our fight over here, so let's just please stop fighting over the episode images. - PokémonGamer 01:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

It is nitpicking because, as I've said, the other image was fine, which is why I reverted it. If you were to change someone else's image, because there is only a slight difference, I'd revert it to. Playerking95 (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
I guess the Ash and Greninja image was nitpicking, but Jessie, James, and Meowth's faces were too dark in that one, so that's what I fixed. Just because you can't see the difference, doesn't mean there isn't a difference. If you don't think there is a difference and that's why you're reverting it, in which case, I don't see why you're reverting it to the lower quality (in comparison) version that you uploaded because it does nothing good and just wastes storage resources. Unless there's any problems, I doubt you should be reverting an image even if it was to have no difference, just because you can't see the difference, because it does nothing good and the only job it does is waste resources. If someone wants to upload a higher quality image, let them do so and do not revert an image if you can't see the difference just so you can get the chance to revert someone again. Besides, it wasn't "fine" if the color was too dark than it's supposed to be, and higher quality images are preferred. It's not me nitpicking, it's just that you don't understand what I'm doing. See BWS02.png, where Gabo 2oo improved the colors. So yeah, users do make quality improvements sometimes, and that's okay. Stop reverting people if they do. That's why I'm bringing this up on your talk page rather than reverting it again, so I don't get in an edit war with you. - PokémonGamer 04:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: File:XY106.png

I've noticed the upload wars you've been involved with. If you have a problem with another person's edits, instead of getting into a public edit war, we suggest that you take it to the user's talk page, and try to negotiate a solution with them. If that fails, please take the issue to an admin, and have them weigh in the situation. - Chosen of Mana 04:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


Please check the recent uploads to see if the file you want to upload isn't already uploaded. Also, that could work as the Clemontic Gear image, the one I uploaded. Also, not really a requirement, just a recommendation, when naming extra scene images, don't name it with the next number another file isn't blocking, name it with the epicode. For example, Extra Scene XY106. - PokémonGamer 11:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

It's okay to name it that, there's no real requirement. Also, I've had a discussion with another user and we decided to prefer the epicode. - PokémonGamer 11:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
The only requirement there is is that it must be descriptive. The epicode is descriptive. In fact, more descriptive than using the next number another image isn't blocking. Plus, there's other images named without the extra scene format. - PokémonGamer 11:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
I did check and your file did not fit the naming of the previous similar titles files and the summary also doesn't follow that as well, so yes, you shouldn't have changed how those files should be named. Please do not do that again. P.S. Stop adding multiple posts to a talk page. :DPlayerking95 (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
The reason is because I realize something I forgot to mention and we're not allowed to edit our comments, also as long as the name and description are good, that's all that counts. It doesn't need to match the exact format of the other images, only stuff like episode images need to follow that rule, because there's a requirement that they need to be named specifically by that epicode. I know how stuff works here. I will not revert you however even though I think you're wrong because I don't want to start an edit war. - PokémonGamer 11:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
There is when the others match the same format. So, please don't change the format. Playerking95 (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Me and SuperPikaPool13 have also proposed renaming the old ones to this format. It just hasn't been done yet. Those are just the current names. - PokémonGamer 12:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
If the file needed a different name, just put {{move}}, and an admin can take care of it from there. - PokémonGamer 12:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want the naming format to change, bring it up with an admin, so until that happens, leave it. Playerking95 (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Pattyman said they will be renamed here, but they're waiting for the dub to see if the Poké TV's will get dubbed too, and/or with different names. - PokémonGamer 12:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Well until we see if the dub will present them or not, for the last time, leave it be. Playerking95 (talk) 14:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


Hey, there. I have a question for you. Do you think you can upload a better image of Malamar and Inkay being temporarily used by Clemont and James from XY054 and maybe upload images of Cobalion, Terrakion, and Virizion being temporarily used by Ash, Iris, and Cilan in the 15th Pokémon movie, please? Seabiscuit2020 (talk) 02:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

I Love Chespin

I saw you uploaded the I Love Chespin image I linked. Since I'm not autoconfirmed yet, and can't upload the images myself, maybe I can send you the images so you can upload them, since we're using it for the Poke TV page on Bulbapedia. Because here's the thing, while it was skipped in the broadcast, I apparently have access to it, so I can get the images and send them to you. - HyruleWarrior (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Here., And yeah, after Chespin imitates Makuhita, a real Makuhita appears, since you don't have access to the segment.--HyruleWarrior (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC
Yeah, except one of those images needs to be of the title screen to the Chespin's Funny Faces segment. But thanks, fellow Pokémon fan, and I hope you continue watching the show and continue to be a beloved Gamer of the series. :D Playerking95 (talk) 12:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
I can get a title screen image. And yeah, I do play games like Pokémon X and Y and watch the anime.--HyruleWarrior (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Here it is. (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey, now that I'm autoconfirmed, I can upload images. I saw some of your images have the logo on them. Where I go to watch the episodes (a streaming service where I pay 933 yen per month, which is where I found the Poké TV segment, and new episodes appear there 30 minutes after the TV broadcast), does not have the logo on it shown during the episodes, and the ones you uploaded are from Japanese TV broadcasts, which is why they have the logo on them. I'll try to replace them with images without the logo. - HyruleWarrior (talk) 04:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Upload warring and block

If someone changes an image that you have uploaded, don't just revert it because you feel your images are always superior. Getting into upload wars and fights, like you seem to frequently do, only serves to waste server resources and simply isn't permitted on the Archives. Please take these next two weeks to take a bit of a break to calm down, and understand that your actions do have consequences. - Kogoro - Talk to me - 21:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Kogoro! I just got too carried away there. Please! Just unblock me! Come on, won't you? Playerking96 (talk) 03:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Ugh! Why did Maverick Nate block me? Playerking94 (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
You simply can't break another entirely different set of rules in order to get around an entirely warranted, short block of two weeks. It's against the rules across all of Bulbagarden to have more than one account, especially when they are only created in order to edit while blocked, so your block has been extended by 1 week. I recommend using that time to read over Archives rules, our Code of Conduct and other policies, and anything else detailed in your initial welcome message. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to e-mail (using Archives/Bulbapedia's "e-mail this user" function on the toolbar of every user talk page) myself, Kogoro, or any other staff member, and we will answer them. MaverickNate 03:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Correct dimensions

Hi there! Just so you know, there is nothing inherently wrong with cropped images or panorama shots. You should not correct dimensions of a thing that isn't incorrect. If you look at Serena's page, you'll see that there are quite a few images that do not match the 1280×720 dimensions. All of these images are perfectly fine. They are better than the ones with "correct dimensions" because they show more of the character's body and they focus on the characters instead of showing trees or boring backgrounds. If you have any questions, let me know. --Mikuri (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Upload warring, final warning

As noted in the title, this is your final warning about getting into upload wars. If a user changes an image & you disagree with the change, you absolutely must bring it up with that user either on the file's talk page, or their own talk page and try to reach an agreement in what to do. If an agreement can't be reached, then a staff member should be brought in to resolve the dispute. Staff member resolution should be considered final and not be further argued. Onto Ash Noivern Dragon Claw.png, you completely missed my point regarding my reversion, it had nothing to do with the little logo in the corner. The point is that the appearance of the move should look clean. Your shot is full of impact dust which simply muddies up what these move images are for. We don't need to see the move making impact, we just need a clean look at the physical appearance of the move.

Due to your history of getting into upload wars, you have been blocked for the duration of three months. This will also be the final temporary block you will receive for failing to communicate with your fellow contributors & getting into upload wars. Further violation will result in a permanent block from the Bulbagarden Archives. - Kogoro - Talk to me - 21:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Anime moves

Just to let you know, an anime move just needs to be shown as being executed, it does not matter if it makes contact or not. Physical moves like High Jump Kick are fine, but special or status moves like Thunderbolt just needs to show the move being executed. Thank you.--Force Fire (talk) 05:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Just so we're clear on this, when I say physical moves I mean moves that make contact, not moves that are classified as physical moves.--Force Fire (talk) 05:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
That's fair enough, I know that they don't HAVE to show the move making contact, but since there is a logoless, reasonable quality screenshot of Pikachu using the move and it also making contact, which I think it's better to show what the moves do, since that is the cornerstone of what the moves are about, then why not keep this one? It shows Pikachu using it and it making contact, and as I've said, wouldn't it be better to show moves making their own respective effects on the opponents? I mean, what's wrong with that if he have an opportunity to use that? So please, can the image be changed back? Playerking95 (talk) 07:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Why does it matter if it's making contact? The point of the image is to show what the move looks like in the anime, not what effect it has on the opponent.--Force Fire (talk) 12:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Why does it matter if it's not making contact? I mean both show Pikahcu using the move, but wouldn't it better to show the moves effect being used on the opponent, because as I said earlier, that's one of the main cornerstones of the moves, their affects. Otherwise all moves might as well be a generic laser attack that all the Pokemon use and that's their only move. I mean, if both show the Pokemon using the move, but one show's the opponent being hit by the effect, in this case, Metagross being zapped by electricity, why not showcase that? I don't see how what I'm saying now is any different to what I said prior and no offense, but I thought that what I originally said was pretty clear. Playerking95 (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
No. The main point of the image is to show what it looks like in the anime. Not their effects. Gee Thunderbolt zaps the opponent, who knew? If users wanted to know what the effects are, they'd read the description.--Force Fire (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Okay, the sarcasm is unnecessary, so please stop using it and the description doesn't alway detail how the move is shown affecting the opponent and you can't say you can just look at images from the games, because they sometimes look different in the anime and this is for the anime's section. I just can't see why if both images show the move being used by a Pokemon, and one also shows it being used on the opponent, why that image isn't just a slightly better option? And even if the main point is to show the respective Pokemon using it, why that rule can't be changed so that it should also include the move being used on the opponent if possible. Playerking95 (talk) 16:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
People can come to their own conclusion on what Thunderbolt looks like when it hits the opponent, like I said, it zaps the opponent... we don't really need to have a visual of something that should be obvious. And for the most part, a majority of moves have the exact same effect on in the anime as it does in the games. Like I said, does it matter? The image is perfectly fine. No logo. Not blurry. So why change something that does not need fixing?--Force Fire (talk) 04:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit War

"Why does it matter if it's making contact? The point of the image is to show what the move looks like in the anime, not what effect it has on the opponent.".--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

As I've already alluded to. "Physical moves like High Jump Kick are fine" and "when I say physical moves I mean moves that make contact" Playerking95 (talk) 14:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
And adding a pic where you can see two different moves as a move of 1 -mon whose body is barely recognizable? Whut.?--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Except that it's not barely recognisable, anyone can see it. Playerking95 (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Alva's moves

Hey can you tell me why pictures like Alva Vivillon Energy Ball and Alva Pyroar Flamethrower need to be uploaded. I can't see where they would be needed on Bulbapedia.--Rahl (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Because other characters of the day's Pokemon have pictures of their Pokemon using moves here as well? Playerking95 (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Well yes but they are only characters of the day. If the move is not being put to use somewhere why bother? They aren't important characters.--Rahl (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Permanent block warning

Despite having been warned and blocked numerous times, you have once again engaged in an upload war without bothering to contact the other person or an Administrator to intervene. As Kogoro mentioned, the next time you are blocked for this reason you will be blocked from Bulbagarden Archives permanently. - Chosen of Mana 18:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

But one reverting isn't edit warring. Playerking95 (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Playerking95... The long and short of it is, you are on very thin ice. If you can't learn to err on the side of caution, you will find yourself receiving your final block. I'll leave you with this: if you disagree with what an image should be, talk to someone and leave the image alone. Perhaps that will be frustrating for you, but if you wish to continue contributing here, that's the best chance you'll have. Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
As I said, I didn't edit war. Playerking95 (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
This is not at all a discussion of whether you were edit warring, Playerking95. I'm trying to make clear what we expect since you don't seem to get it. But if you want to continue to insist on that, then I'll leave you to your mistakes. Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
If this isn't about that, then what's the point of the discussion, because I know what you said and I did nothing wrong, so there are no mistakes. I uploaded an image and reverted another, which didn't seem to fit the criteria for what the image should be and when it was reverted back, I took what was said on advisement and then I came across a better image. What was I supposed to do once I found an image that everyone would be happy with, just leave it alone. What's wrony with finding an all compromising image? Playerking95 (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The original point was giving you one (more) final warning and chance to mend your behavior before we entirely exhaust our patience and resort to your final ban here.
I'll suggest this regarding your conflict on the image for Jessie's Mimikyu (this is all IMO by the way): when someone first changed the image, there were two good options for you: 1) start a discussion with the person or with a staff member or on the file's talk page, or 2) immediately find and upload a better image. If you chose the latter option and someone changed it again, it would be a VERY bad idea for you to revert that or even try to choose another image. (Just in case: Please don't mistake this as exact rules that everyone must follow. Right now, this advice is tailored very specifically to your circumstances (which are special and arguing it will get you nowhere). We may be happy if everyone followed such guidelines, but I'm talking about you here, not anyone else.) The long and short of it is, you need to learn to discuss. Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Those weren't the only options, because there's nothing wrong with reverting. I'm allowed to revert and no one has said otherwise and I don't think I should be made to follow any specific rule, when I've done nothing wrong. I have DISCUSSED before and that's after I have reverted an image (and rightfully so, when the other image wasn't exactly up to standards) and that change was reverted by someone else. One revert isn't an edit war, especially when it was meant to be something final, and there was a belief that it wouldn't be reverted and turn into a war, which, if it did, as I said, there would be a discussion. So, I don't see how one little revert is doing anything any harm, when others are allowed to and others have done the same thing I have, reverting images multiple times in an edit war fashion, which I don't do anymore. Playerking95 (talk) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Playerking... please take a look at the history section of the Jessie's Mimikyu file and tell me how many times your name appears with the word reverted next to it. You have clearly not reverted only once. Yes, there is everything wrong with reverting, especially in your case when you're a serial reverter. You are allowed to replace an image, but not revert someone just because you have a different opinion. You have not discussed anything with Rahl. You never discuss anything with anyone. You just run around reverting around because you just simply have the power to. And yes, you are made to follow a specific rule for you because "taking stuff to the talk page rather then reverting" seems to be such an abstract concept for you to comprehend that it had to come down to this. Sorry for being so hard, but this is the kind of harsh reality you need before you get yourself permanently blocked.--Force Fire (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

You're wrong. I have discussed things, so this isn't some "abstract concept" and don't act like it is. And I have looked at the file in question. I reverted each image once. I uploaded an image, it got changed, so I reverted it and then it got changed and I uploaded another image, that got changed, so I reverted that image once. Reverting once isn't a problem. So, no, I shouldn't be made to follow a specific rule when I'm not edit warring anymore and I'm not the only one involved in these things. And if I haven't discussed things with specific members, then that is simply because doing so would be a waste of time when they stupidly are targeting me and won't listen to what I have to say and if they ever happen to magically listen, then I'll ride a flying pig. Playerking95 (talk) 07:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No. You have not discussed things. Otherwise, you would've went to Rahl's page and asked why his image was good. But that's a waste of time, so lets waste more time edit warring. "I reverted each image once". Is that not edit warring? Yes... yes it is. What you described is the very essence of edit warring. Just because you reverted each image once doesn't mean you've only reverted once, that's not how it works. You're under the presumption that this rule is from this incident. It's not. It's from every single time you've edit warred on the Archives and the Wiki. We didn't look at this incident and say "lets make a rule", we looked at your entire history of edit warring and came to that conclusion. And users don't listen because you don't engage with them and ask why they reverted you. Someone has to take the initiative, if they're not going to come to you, go to them.--Force Fire (talk) 09:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No, I have discussed, so accept that, because that IS the truth and anything else is a blatant lie. Also, that is not edit warring. One revert is not a war. And I didn't say that it was because of this, especially when I didn't do anything wrong on that file's name and you're acting like all I do is reverting, which again, you are wrong about. And again, you're wrong, they don't engage because they won't listed. I'm not the only one that has to engage first, because as I have said time and TIME again, I'm not the only one in this. Playerking95 (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't see you discussing the Jessie's Mimikyu file on Rahl's talk page. I don't know how you're defining what an edit war is, because reverting every time someone uploads a new image is edit warring. I didn't say all you do is edit war, but how many times you've edit warred. Like I said, someone has to take the initiative. If they're not going to go to you, YOU go to THEM.--Force Fire (talk) 09:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


I see you're uploading images of PG18 too, but one important thing: if you see that someone else is uploading similar pictures as you are, don't start racing to get to do it first! Your links are often incomplete, your Charizard picture (which I, by the way, personally consider to have an incomplete title and thus be inferior to my version despite yours "being here first") completely lacks description. I am a bit older than you, judging by your user name, so try to have a liiitle more respect towards those with more experience than you, okay? --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

1: Please, this is no race. I decided to upload them. Just because you are also doing that, it doesn't mean it's a race. 2: Your title does not make it better. 3: Yes, if it was uploaded first, it counts. With that logic, you can now upload an image of Ash's Pikachu under a different file name and we should just use that. 4: A little more respect? Sure, when you give some first and you DO NOT have more experience than me. Playerking95 (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, it's late evening where I am so I'm a bit tired, and I just fell into one of my impulsive rants over there. I apologize. You must've been uploading images unknowing of my uploads and vice versa, so no grudges held. Errare humanum est. --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Ps. A friendly little hint: at least most of Bulbapedia's link templates work on this site as well, such as the P-template for (Pokémon)-pages.
Yeah, I'm not buying your fake nice guy act when you've been nothing but rude to me for the last year or so. Please revert your edit to PG18's file as it does not meet the criteria, image wise and size wise. Playerking95 (talk) 06:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Permanent Block

After careful consideration of your recent and past activities on the Bulbagarden Archives, it has been decided that you are no longer welcome to contribute to this section of Bulbagarden. You constantly get into revert wars, you frequently get into fights with other users where you disregard other opinions with prejudice and insist that nobody's uploads can be better than yours, you twist staff words to try and get your way, as well as several other behaviors completely contrary to the goals of the Bulbagarden Archives. The camel's back is sufficiently broken here, so your account is now permanently blocked. - Kogoro - Talk to me - 09:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)