User talk:Force Fire
Anime screenshots
As the common guideline goes, please upload anime screenshots in .png format, not in .jpg format. Thank you. UltimateSephiroth 12:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Charmander and Charmeleon images
Your images of Ash's Charmander and Charmeleon are worse quality than the ones we had before. Could you try to make them better quality? Chocolate 17:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I can't seem to find better Images of them. Pokémon websites around the internet are useless. (Except for this one)....--Force Fire 01:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Bulbagarden Archives, Force Fire. Please read the checklist when you upload media files, and be sure to tag and categorize all images. Maverick Nate 02:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Categories
Uhm, FF, always make sure that you categorize your uploaded image into its respective category, by adding [[Category:<category name>]] in the summary. Thanks, ^^ Kevzo8 12:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- soooo tired, I'll categorize in the future--Force Fire 12:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, since you're uploading anime headers, use this:
{{i-Fairuse-anime-head-Epicode|<Epicode><Ep. No>|<Ep. No.>}}Thanks, ^^ --Kevzo8 10:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)- You can't use the above unless the image is the header of the episode. Do not put it on unless the name of what you upload is DP001.png, DP002.png, etc. That is the header template and only belongs on the actual header images, not random images you upload. Maverick Nate 03:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh I see.--Force Fire 10:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- You can't use the above unless the image is the header of the episode. Do not put it on unless the name of what you upload is DP001.png, DP002.png, etc. That is the header template and only belongs on the actual header images, not random images you upload. Maverick Nate 03:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, since you're uploading anime headers, use this:
HEY GUESS WHAT
Pocketmonsters! They hate us! Let's not get Sunain all pissy at me again! TTEchidna 03:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- -_-;--Force Fire 03:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes! Feel bad! Because Sunain's seriously that pissy. TTEchidna 07:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Names
Plural names are simply the Species name, no s. Maverick Nate 12:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
silver sprite
all gen i and gen ii sprite are in 56x56 format. the image is stretched after uploading a new image, but it will become normal in a few days -Pokeant 14:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Routes 47 and 48
We can't use those images. For obvious reasons. —darklordtrom 10:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
RB art
Where'd you find them? The source may be of great use!--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 12:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Psypokes.... I think....--Force Fire 08:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yup... thanks!--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Found a better source, though they're all jpgs... here. Just letting you know.--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's ok, but the artifacts are all around the Pokémon (especially Ivysaur).--Force Fire 07:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Found a better source, though they're all jpgs... here. Just letting you know.--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yup... thanks!--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Stadium
Everything goes into Category:Stadium If you could also remove from the images the two categories I deleted, that would be appreciated. MaverickNate 17:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Got through some of them.--Force Fire 08:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, can you also create transparent images of these images? Thanks. ht14 03:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try--Force Fire 07:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Now that Template:Stadium model is coded the way it should be, go around and subst it again on all those pages. MaverickNate 15:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Uhm, FF, I guess you missed putting
subst:as Nate instructed.. You know, templates with headings (with ==whatever==) lets user edit the template which is bad, that's why we need to subst: it. Thanks, Kevzo8 11:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)- Oops, didn't realize that.--Force Fire 11:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try--Force Fire 07:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, can you also create transparent images of these images? Thanks. ht14 03:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, question. Is there only one sprite of Unown for Stadium 2 or are all 26 of them there? If so, upload them all. I'll "revive" the template if that's the case. ht14 05:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's what I was thinking to myself too. I'm not sure if there is though.--Force Fire 09:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Reverting the edit
I reverted the edit on Kogoro's talk page because the second sockpuppet of his said the same thing as his first one, topic-wise, which I found to be spam prior to your revert. There must have been a rule regarding which item is actually spam. Pattyman (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- I only reverted it because I didn't see it as spam. I'd rather wait for Kogoro to decide what to do.--Force Fire (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Anime move images with the Generation V and below spelling
Do you want the anime move images, the ones that existed in Generation V and below, to be in the Generation VI spelling? The spelling itself was like that on the Bulbapedia side. You can discuss this with other staff if you want. Pattyman (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'd say just leave it be.--Force Fire (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Help for Season 1 opening screenshot
In the File:OPE01.png, I have uploaded a brighter DVD source version but it's not showing not that bright and showing it as it was before. When I reverted it then the history small image in that image history was showing that bright. Then when I again reverted it it was still not showing bright. I uploaded and reverted them yesterday but today still it's not showing bright. Why is that happening? Yash Sen (talk) 08:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Request
Could you please revert the Ash Talonflame Flame Charge image back to the previous one, because I found one that shows it making contact and still shows Talonflame using it and you said that it's fine to show moves making contact if they are physical in nature and the one I found was, but it's been reverted twice now. You can basically tell it's Talonflame in both pictures, but what's wrong with having one that is making contact? Playerking95 (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I did not say that it was better, I said it was optional. Again, why does it even matter if it's making contact? When I said physical moves are fine, that was on an "if" clause. As in, if the previous image was bad, low quality/has a logo, then yes you can change the image, and whether the Pokemon is making contact or not in your image, it does not matter. As long as the new image is a better quality picture than the last.
- However, if the previous image is fine, then there's no need to change it just because the one you have is making contact. Because like I said, why does it matter?.--Force Fire (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Because you said moves like High Jump Kick and such are fine, you never said it could only be if the previous image was significantly worse, so that's not my fault that those specifics were left out and it should better for PHYSICAL moves to show them PHYSICALLY making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Force Fire never said that contact moves making contact in pictures was a priority - a better quality picture validates over everything and anything - how is that so hard to understand? O.o--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it. And he did say it was okay, because as I said, he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality so I understand everything that is being said, I just can't understand things when they're not being said, so I don't think you understand. Playerking95 (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- It should be common sense, you don't just replace a perfectly okay image to fit your views. That, quite simply, is petty.--Force Fire (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not really and you never implied that it had to be like that. I'm sorry for thinking that, but I don't see how that is common sense. For example, so it's not okay if it's just a simple change to improve it? So I guess if there was a great quality of an image with a logo and then someone uploaded the same one without the logo, then that wouldn't be worth changing? Physical moves should be made to show them making contact, because physicality is all about making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- The image's purpose is to show what the move looks like in the anime. It making contact is optional. An official rule (no logos) severely outweighs a minor, if trivial, opinion.--Force Fire (talk) 15:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) For what it's worth, I agree with ShallowShaddoll that your proposed new version of the Flame Charge image is actually of a worse quality than the previous version (the image as a whole is blurrer, and contains compression artefacts), so I don't see the improvement that you are suggesting. Had it been an image of objectively higher quality and also depicts the move making contact, fine; however, this is not the case. This is a wiki, and as the tagline of Bulbapedia suggests, "community-driven", so I will weigh in on such matters as I please, until another staff member tells me otherwise.
- "he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality" - at this point, I think you are simply wikilawyering. Do you really think that "making contact" trumps "technical quality", and if so, do we really have to go to the ridiculous extent of codifying this in policy? Chenzw (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- The image's purpose is to show what the move looks like in the anime. It making contact is optional. An official rule (no logos) severely outweighs a minor, if trivial, opinion.--Force Fire (talk) 15:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not really and you never implied that it had to be like that. I'm sorry for thinking that, but I don't see how that is common sense. For example, so it's not okay if it's just a simple change to improve it? So I guess if there was a great quality of an image with a logo and then someone uploaded the same one without the logo, then that wouldn't be worth changing? Physical moves should be made to show them making contact, because physicality is all about making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- It should be common sense, you don't just replace a perfectly okay image to fit your views. That, quite simply, is petty.--Force Fire (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it. And he did say it was okay, because as I said, he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality so I understand everything that is being said, I just can't understand things when they're not being said, so I don't think you understand. Playerking95 (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Force Fire never said that contact moves making contact in pictures was a priority - a better quality picture validates over everything and anything - how is that so hard to understand? O.o--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Because you said moves like High Jump Kick and such are fine, you never said it could only be if the previous image was significantly worse, so that's not my fault that those specifics were left out and it should better for PHYSICAL moves to show them PHYSICALLY making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
