1,651
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
From Bulbagarden Archives
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Request
Playerking95 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:::Force Fire never said that contact moves making contact in pictures was a '''priority''' - a better quality picture validates over everything and anything - how is that so hard to understand? O.o--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | :::Force Fire never said that contact moves making contact in pictures was a '''priority''' - a better quality picture validates over everything and anything - how is that so hard to understand? O.o--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it. And he did say it was okay, because as I said, he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality so I understand everything that is being said, I just can't understand things when they're not being said, so I don't think you understand. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 15:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it. And he did say it was okay, because as I said, he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality so I understand everything that is being said, I just can't understand things when they're not being said, so I don't think you understand. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 15:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::It should be common sense, you don't just replace a perfectly okay image to fit your views. That, quite simply, is petty.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 15:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
