34,516
edits
User talk:Coffee/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
From Bulbagarden Archives
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Reporting user and thoughts about Autoconfirmed treshold
Laspandrea (talk | contribs) (→Reporting user and thoughts about Autoconfirmed treshold: new section) |
|||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
This yet another case make me think about the need of increasing the treshold to become an Autoconfirmed user, here in Archives (in Bulbapedia, it's much higher) or, at least, explain to new Archives users how, and why, to categorize or licensing more efficently. [[User:Laspandrea|Laspandrea]] ([[User talk:Laspandrea|talk]]) 09:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC) | This yet another case make me think about the need of increasing the treshold to become an Autoconfirmed user, here in Archives (in Bulbapedia, it's much higher) or, at least, explain to new Archives users how, and why, to categorize or licensing more efficently. [[User:Laspandrea|Laspandrea]] ([[User talk:Laspandrea|talk]]) 09:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
:As of now, the Archives shares its autoconfirmed threshold with Bulbapedia, meaning edits from both here and Bulbapedia proper contribute to auto-confirmation status. Changing that threshold would have a larger impact on the website as a whole. | |||
:While this user's edits may have been misguided, the time to call them out and warn them has long since passed. Meanwhile, since becoming auto-confirmed, their contributions have been nothing but constructive. Lastly, they have not been active since late February. With all due respect, I ultimately do not see a problem here. - [[bp:User:Chosen|<span style="color:#336799">Chosen</span>]] ([[User talk:Chosen|<span style="color:#000">Talk</span>]]) 14:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
